Legal Opinion

Rieman v. Joubert

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1985No. C3-84-1412Published

1Opinion of the Court

361 N.W.2d 909 (1985)

William C. RIEMAN, Jr., Respondent,

v.

Jarrel D. JOUBERT, Appellant.

No. C3-84-1412.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 12, 1985.

Thomas A. Egan, Burnsville, for respondent.

George M. Roehrdanz, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and FOLEY and CRIPPEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

FACTS

Respondent William Rieman commenced an action against appellant Jarrel Joubert for breach of an oral contract in which Joubert agreed to pay Rieman $5,000 for his interest in a corporation jointly owned by the parties. On August 30, 1983, the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Pamida, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Tompkins v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. O'BRIEN v. WendtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Davidner v. DavidnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Driscoll v. EnersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API