State v. Mathews

Defendant, Howard D. Mathews, was found guilty by a jury, of possession of heroin, a narcotic drug, and grand larceny. He appeals from the judgment entered upon the jury verdict.

Defendant’s counsel concedes that any appeal from the grand larceny conviction would be frivolous 'and without merit. In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), he discusses the two matters which might arguably support an appeal. We have reviewed the record and agree that no meritorious issues are presented in the record as to the grand larceny conviction. See State…