Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 29, 1999No. 40938-7-IPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Agid, A.C.J.

— Matthew Johnson appeals his Violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act (VUCSA) conviction, alleging that the trial court erred in (1) admitting evidence seized in violation of RCW 10.31.040, the “knock and announce” rule; (2) denying his motion to dismiss the deadly weapon allegation because his weapon was not easily accessible at the time of arrest; (3) denying his motion to suppress statements made without a valid waiver of Miranda rights, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966); (4) improperly instructing the jury on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. SchelinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. SchelinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API