Legal Opinion

In re Radson

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided December 6, 2011No. 11-23853-JKOPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order Denying Debtor’s Late-Filed Motion to Continue the Automatic Stay [ECF No. SI]

JOHN K. OLSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The automatic stay terminated in this case thirty days post-petition by operation of 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(A). The Debtor did not file a § 362(c)(3)(B) motion to continue the stay until ninety-four days post-petition. The Debtor now asks this court to use its equitable power under § 105(a) to impose the automatic stay nunc pro *912tunc to the petition date. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.

Background

The Debtor filed a pro se Chapter 13 petition on October 8, 2010…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scrivner v. MashburnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Whitaker v. Baxter (In Re Whitaker)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2006
  3. In Re Toro-ArcilaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  4. In Re BarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  5. In Re GarrettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re MartinezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2014
  2. Lattin v. Midland Mortgage Co. (In re Lattin)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  3. In re: Brian Patrick MolloyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. In re: Davon Weatherholt & Tina WeatherholtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  5. Kimberly Richmond HardyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API