Legal Opinion

In Re Toro-Arcila

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 12, 2005No. 05-95138PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Court deals with an issue of first impression: whether § 362(c)(4)(B) authorizes the Court to reimpose the automatic stay in a case where:

1. The debtor has had one previous case pending in the previous year;

2. The debtor filed a motion seeking to reimpose the stay within 30 days of filing his latest bankruptcy petition; and

3.The Court did not rule on the motion before the expiration of 30 days from the filing of the latest petition.

Background

Mr. Toro-Arcila filed the present case on November 8, 2005. His original chapter 13…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. In Re CharlesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Baxter (In Re Whitaker)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2006
  2. In Re FergusonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. In Re SalazarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  4. In Re CollinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  5. In Re FurlongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API