Legal Opinion
In re Martinez
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Decided September 11, 2014No. CASE NO. 14-21667-RAMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPTER 13
SECOND AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND THE AUTOMATIC STAY1
Robert A. Mark, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court
If a debtor had a prior case pending within a year of the filing date of a new case, the automatic stay terminates on the 30th day of the new case unless the court extends the stay “after notice and a hearing completed before the expiration of the 30-day period.” 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) (emphasis added). In this case, Flor Lis-sette Martinez (the “Debtor”), is asking the Court to extend the 30 day deadline under 11 U.S.C. § 105. Because the Supreme Court’s controlling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Whitaker v. Baxter (In Re Whitaker)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2006
- In Re JumppUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Damian Morgan and Rae MorganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- In re: Brian Patrick MolloyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- In re: Davon Weatherholt & Tina WeatherholtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Robert Joseph Chester and Belinda Dawn ChesterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2025