Legal Opinion
United States v. Midstate Horticultural Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 30, 1939No. Nos. 286, 287PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
These two appeals present for review a single question. As stated by appellant the sole question in each appeal is “whether or not the indictment charges the commission of an offense against the United States in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, as it must, if appellees are to be prosecuted therein. Constitution, Article 3, Section 2, Clause 3; Amendment VI.”
The defendant in No. 287 was indicted in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania charged with making unlawful rebates on interstate shipments. Defendants in No. 286 were charged, by indictment in the same District, with receiving the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. HolteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. AsiborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Aubrey Baker Davis, Jr., A/K/A Junior Baker Davis, A/K/A Baker Davis, and Margaret DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Santana-CastellanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.