Legal Opinion

State v. Pinkham

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 7, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

A jury in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Delahanty, J.) acquitted Stanley G. Pinkham of rape, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 252(1) (1983 & Supp.1988), but convicted him of gross sexual misconduct. 17-A *659M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(A) (1983 & Supp.1988). On appeal from the conviction, he argues that the Superior Court erred in refusing to suppress statements he made to the investigating officer. He also argues that the jury verdict is incapable of logical reconciliation. We find no error and we affirm the judgment.

Before trial, Pinkham moved to suppress statements he made to Trooper Setter of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. PhilbrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. State v. ThibodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HeweySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. State v. IzzoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. State v. BraggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. State v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API