Legal Opinion

State v. Bragg

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 11, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Richard Bragg appeals from judgments of the Superior Court (Andros-coggin County, Alexander, J.), entered on jury verdicts, finding him guilty of two counts of engaging in a sexual act with a person under the age of fourteen. 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (Supp.1989). Defendant alleges error in the motion justice’s (Fritzsche, 1) refusal to suppress his confession and contends it was made involuntarily and after he had invoked his right to counsel. Additionally, defendant alleges error in the trial justice’s exclusion of a letter written by the victim, and the denial of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. CaouetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. State v. TardiffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  4. State v. DurostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CummingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  3. State v. McCluskieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. State v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API