Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Swanson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order by the Honorable Hyam Segell of the Ramsey County District Court denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment and certifying to this court the question whether Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 6 of the Workers’ Compensation Act is constitutional under the equal protection clauses of the state and federal constitutions. We hold that the statute is constitutional and thus affirm the trial court.
Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 6 provides: If any employee entitled to the benefits of this chapter is a minor or is an appren tice of any age and sustains a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoyt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Schwartz v. TalmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Insurers' Action Council, Inc. v. HeatonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
- Tracy v. Streater/Litton IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Estate of TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. HollowaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Mills v. Guido'sColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.