Legal Opinion
Armijo v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 21, 1981No. 94-79LPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
The claims here are to recover "just compensation” for takings contrary to the fifth amendment, a time-honored branch of our jurisprudence which has included claims *35founded on the Constitution since the Tucker Act of 1887, now 28 U.S.C. § 1491. The claims present, if valid, another illustration of the variety of possible ways in which the sovereign can entangle itself in monetary liability in taking cases. The case is before us on cross-motions for summary judgment, and we hold that as to the taking date and quantum, the relevant facts have not been stipulated or determined, otherwise, there…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Tabb Lakes, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- John R. Sand & Gravel Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Del-Rio Drilling Programs Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Juda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.