Legal Opinion

Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Askin's Retail Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The sufficiency of the complaint is challenged by the demurrer on two grounds: (1) That the writing complained of is not libelous per se and contains no averment of special damage, and (2) that the complaint shows there was no publication of the alleged libel by the defendants.

1. The distinction between oral and written defamation is well recognized. To determine whether the particular words used are actionable per se, it is necessary to apply a different rule in case of libel from that applicable to slander.

In Simmons v. Morse, 51 N. C., 7, it was said: “A libel, as applicable to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foster-Milburn Co. v. ChinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Hedgepeth Ex Rel. Hedgepeth v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Brown v. Elm City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Pentuff v. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Alexander v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. McKinney v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Smith v. McDonaldDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1983
  4. Downs v. Waremart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Harshaw v. . HarshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API