Henricksen v. Seward
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the principle of res judicata is applicable in a suit by a taxpayer to recover manufacturers’ excise taxes, where in an earlier suit by the same taxpayer it had been held that the latter was not a manufacturer or producer.
The statute involved is § 606(c) of the Revenue Act of 1932, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Acts page 610 imposing, among others, a tax upon automobile parts “sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer” thereof. Appellees are the liquidating trustees of Con-Rod Exchange, Inc., a corporation which at all…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. Armature Rewinding Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ray Schools-Chicago-Inc. v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- McDonald v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Western Union Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Application of Michael Mojzesz SzwarcCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.