Legal Opinion
Estanislau v. Manchester Developers, LLC
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 5, 2004No. 3:02CV1515(PCD)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO AMEND AND MOTION IN LIMINE RE: CREDIT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), Defendant moves to amend its answer to add an affirmative defense stating that Defendant is entitled to a credit against wages due for lodging provided to Plaintiff. Plaintiff opposes this amendment and also files a motion in limine seeking to preclude the introduction of any evidence pertaining to this credit at trial. For the reason stated herein, Defendant’s motion to amend is granted and Plaintiffs motion in limine is denied.
I. BACKGROUND:
Familiarity with the facts of this case…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Keun-Jae Moon v. Joon Gab KwonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Giles v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Donovan v. New Floridian Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Francisco Soler v. G. & U., Inc., and Secretary, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ramirez v. RifkinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Roces v. Reno Hous. Auth.District Court, D. Nevada · 2018
- Gerald Gensoli v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2026
- Jones v. Univesco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
- Modise v. CareOne Health Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.