Legal Opinion
Francisco Soler v. G. & U., Inc., and Secretary, United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 24, 1987No. 789, 790, Dockets 86-6166, 86-6190PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAMPANO, District Judge:
The central issue raised on these appeals is whether the district court erred in setting aside as arbitrary and capricious the determination by the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Administrator (“Administrator”) that certain housing facilities furnished to migrant farm workers primarily benefited the workers and, therefore, could qualify in part as “wages” under § 3(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1983 (“FLSA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 203(m) (hereinafter referred to as § 3(m)).1
We conclude that the district court exceeded the scope of its review authority…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Soler v. G & U, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Just Bagels Manufacturing, Inc. v. MayorkasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Ramos-Barrientos v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.