Legal Opinion

Arunachalam v. Harris

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 22, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-3734Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED 4/22/2021 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Court for the District of Columbia FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-3734 (UNA) ) SCOTT S. HARRIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff describes herself as “the inventor of the Internet of Things (IoT)” and claims ownership of eleven U.S. patents covering her innovations. Compl. ¶ 8. She has filed “over 100 cases” in federal courts, id. ¶ 14, pertaining to the benefits major corporations…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Michael Sindram v. John H. Suda Paul R. Webber, III Oliver P. Corbin Edward Jenkins Everett O'Quinn Frederick B. Beane, Jr. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Thomas v. WilkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Evans v. SuterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API