Jack A. Gullo v. Miriam Anne Hirst and Quin S. Elson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
We approve the ultimate disposition of this case made by the district court. Not only is the matter which the plaintiff sought to litigate in the district court res judicata, but it is also true that the federal courts have never assumed to exercise jurisdiction over domestic relations causes. Finally, the cause is not a proper subject for declaratory judgment.
The background of this case raises serious questions of abuse of process. While we must be careful to assure that the courts are always open to complaining parties, we have an equal obligation to see that its processes are not abused by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Robert W. Duckett v. William F. Steiner, Warden, Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by13 opinions
- In the Matter of Samuel A. BithoneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Flowers v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- John Doe and Ann Smith Doe v. Jane Doe, on Behalf of Her Son, Jack DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Gullo v. HirstDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Cherry v. CherryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.