Legal Opinion
Gullo v. Hirst
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 1965No. 3640PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge:
The parties to this appeal were married in 1951 in the District of Columbia, and will be hereafter referred to as husband and wife. 1 In November 1960 the wife filed suit against the husband in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia, alleging that the parties “were lawfully married” and seeking an absolute divorce. To this complaint the husband filed an answer which denied the allegation that the parties were lawfully married, and he also filed a “plea for annulment of marriage,” alleging that at the time of their marriage the wife was then lawfully married to one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jack A. Gullo v. Miriam Anne Hirst and Quin S. ElsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Tendler v. TendlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Gullo v. GulloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weisman v. MiddletonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Gullo v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Habib v. KeatsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.