Young v. . Young
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Richmond Young, by his next friend, J. O. Griffith, plaintiff, against Zephaniah Young, Jr., Seth Young, B. S. Young and William Hutchins, defendants. The complaint states:
1. That Seth Young, some time in 1856, in order to advance B. S. Young, his son, permitted him to have and to hold a certain tract of land in Yancey county (describing it), and he sold said land, with the consent and approval of his father, to defendant William Hutchins; and Seth Young then and there delivered the grants and mesne conveyances which constituted the chain of title, to Hutchins, and also agreed by parol to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boyd & Suydam v. Hoyt & ParselNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Hamlin v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Bedsole v. . MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
- Holler v. . RichardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Town of Wllkesboro v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Oyster v. Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.