Legal Opinion

Davis v. First Interstate Bank of Idaho, N.A.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1988No. 16977PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

This case involves starving sheep and a promise to lend money. The plaintiffs, Emery and Sam Davis, own sheep which run together. The defendant bank concedes it had a valid contract with plaintiffs to lend money for the sheep ranching operation — and that the bank breached this contract when it failed to lend the plaintiffs money in December of 1983. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs failed to mitigate their damages by seeking alternative financing. We reverse.

Plaintiffs Emery Davis (and his family) and Sam Davis…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gro-Mor, Inc. v. ButtsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Eastern Advertising Co. v. ShapiroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Florence Fish Co. v. Everett Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Margaret H. Wayne Trust v. LipskyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. McCormick International USA, Inc. v. ShoreIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Henderson v. RomerColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API