Witaszek v. Drees
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
The cause of action here arises from the collision of two automobiles, one owned by the defendant Weissgerber and driven, with her consent, by the defendant Drees, and the other owned and driven by the defendant Jensen. As to the three individual defendants, the facts as evidently found by the jury are sufficient to sustain the verdicts as against these three defendants, and, therefore, should not and cannot be disturbed.
*839As to the defendant Granger & Co., the motion (1) to dismiss the complaint (made on the trial and on which decision was held pending the verdict of the jury on certain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Wescott v. Henshaw Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Buck v. Standard Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Huntley v. . MathiasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chatelain v. ThackerayUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Fritz v. KrasneNew York Supreme Court · 1935
- Cerp Construction Co. v. J. J. Cleary, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968