Legal Opinion
Fritz v. Krasne
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChurch, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered as the result of the negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant Samuel Chertok. The complaint alleges that the defendants Julius Krasne, Benjamin Krasne and Israel Krasne had charge, care and management of the automobile, and that at the time of the accident it *443was operated by the defendant Samuel Chertok, who will be called the operator, for and on behalf of the defendants Krasne Brothers, who will be called the partnership.
The first trial of the action resulted in a verdict for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Pyyny v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Brown v. Steamship Terminal Operating Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Witaszek v. DreesNew York Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cooner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Fritz v. KrasneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Cooner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Cooner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960