Vaupel v. Mulhall
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. J. 3?. Oliver, Judge. Action for damages for false representations in the sale of land. Verdict for plaintiff for $13,000. Judgment on tbe verdict for $7,000, plaintiff remitting. Defendant appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, J. —
At the time of the transactions involved *367in this action, the plaintiff was a merchant of Freeport, 111., and the defendant was a dealer in real estate at Sioux City, Iowa. The plaintiff was desirous of purchasing real estate, and of paying therefor, in part, with goods to be selected by him from the shelves of his store at Freeport. lie called at the office of the defendant at Sioux City for the .purpose of ascertaining what he had for sale. The defendant sent- one Oasselman with the plaintiff and his son to see the farm in question. This farm is known in the record as the “Fisher…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. Harder & AverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Likes v. BaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- McRae v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Likes v. BaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stoke v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Peterson v. McManusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Ross v. BolteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Skeels v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Hess v. McCardellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.