State v. Nguyen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
¶1 Troung Nguyen participated in three home invasion robberies. He was convicted of multiple counts of burglary, robbery, and assault. He contends that under Blakely v. Washington,1 imposition of multiple firearm enhancements violated double jeopardy and that, in *866any event, the court had no authority to impose them pursuant to State v. Recuenco.2 He also argues that collection of his DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) constituted an unreasonable search and seizure. We reject these arguments, as well as several arguments Nguyen makes pro se, and affirm.
FACTS
¶2 During the fall of 2003, Troung Nguyen…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Sattazahn v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.