Legal Opinion

Royster Co. v. Eastern Distribution, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1990No. 23169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This case is before the Court on writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. We granted certiorari to review the case of Royster Company v. Eastern Distribution, Inc., 298 S. C. 51, 378 S. E. (2d) 71 (Ct. App. 1989), in which the Court of Appeals held that a motion for change of venue does not have to be addressed prior to the disposition of a motion for summary judgment. We reverse the Court of Appeals.

I. FACTS

Respondent Royster Company sued petitioner Eastern Distribution, Inc. and Vaughan Products, Inc. for breach of contract. Petitioner filed a motion for change of venue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chestnut v. ReidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Royster Co. v. Eastern Distribution, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeter v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Brandt Ex Rel. Estate of Brandt v. GoodingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Carroll v. GuessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Truck South, Inc. v. PatelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API