Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Guess

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 6, 1990No. 23250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

The issue before this Court is whether a known defendant is entitled to trial in the county of his residence when the co-defendant is unknown and consequently, the co-defendant’s residence also is unknown.

I. FACTS

Respondents Kenny Carroll and Elliott Hutson were involved in an automobile accident involving the vehicle respondents occupied and another vehicle driven by either appellant William Guess, a resident of Bamberg County, or an unknown defendant “John Doe,” whose residence is unknown. Respondents brought this action for damages in Hampton County against both appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chestnut v. ReidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Warren v. PADGETTSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. MacK v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Royster Co. v. Eastern Distribution, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Breland v. Love Chevrolet Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Jeter v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Electronic World, Inc. v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API