Legal Opinion

Amortibanc Investment Co. v. Jehan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1976No. 47,940PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Prager, J.:

This is an action brought to recover judgment for sums due on a mortgage note, for determination of priorities of liens, and for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage. The plaintiff-appellant is Amortibanc Investment Company, Inc., a Wichita investment company. Original defendants in the action are Dr. Sayed S. Jehan and his wife, Yasmeen Jehan, who executed the note and mortgage, and eight subcontractors and materialmen claiming liens on the real estate described in the mortgage.

The facts in the case are somewhat complicated and are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parsons Mobile Products., Inc. v. RemmertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Atlas Industries, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Landrum v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. Cline v. AngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. Topeka Savings Association v. BeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dugan v. First Nat'l Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Hall v. MullenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Hollenbeck v. Household BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Akandas, Inc. v. KlippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Kansas State Bank & Trust Co. v. DeLoreanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API