Legal Opinion

Akandas, Inc. v. Klippel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 28, 1992No. 66,507PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ABBOTT, J.:

The plaintiffs sought judgment that certain oil and gas leases had expired. The resolution of that issue depends upon the interpretation of a document entitled “Unitization Agreement.”

The plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest are mineral interest owners who entered into oil and gas leases. Each lease contains a habendum clause, specifying an initial or primary term ranging from one month to five years and a secondary term for “as long thereafter as oil or gas, or either, is produced from said land” or words to that effect. None of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kennedy & Mitchell, Inc. v. Anadarko Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Elliott v. Crystal Springs Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Stratmann v. StratmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Farrell v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Skelly Oil Co. v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Thoroughbred Associates, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Royalty Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Park University Enterprises, Inc. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PADistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  3. Kansas Baptist Convention v. Mesa Operating Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. Steele v. Guardianship & Conservatorship of CristSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Wagnon v. Slawson Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API