Akandas, Inc. v. Klippel
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
ABBOTT, J.:
The plaintiffs sought judgment that certain oil and gas leases had expired. The resolution of that issue depends upon the interpretation of a document entitled “Unitization Agreement.”
The plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest are mineral interest owners who entered into oil and gas leases. Each lease contains a habendum clause, specifying an initial or primary term ranging from one month to five years and a secondary term for “as long thereafter as oil or gas, or either, is produced from said land” or words to that effect. None of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kennedy & Mitchell, Inc. v. Anadarko Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Elliott v. Crystal Springs Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Stratmann v. StratmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Farrell v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Thoroughbred Associates, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Royalty Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Park University Enterprises, Inc. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PADistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Kansas Baptist Convention v. Mesa Operating Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Steele v. Guardianship & Conservatorship of CristSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Wagnon v. Slawson Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.