Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Riverside & Fort Lee Ferry Co.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided December 11, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon carefully considering the entire evidence in this case, I find and determine as follows:

That the petitioner’s decedent, John Muir, was regularly employed by the respondent as a dock tender at its Edgewater ferry house, Edgewater, TSTew Jersey, and that the said employment was subject to article II of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. It has been definitely adjudicated that the locality "test governs in determining whether the Maritime law or the Workmen’s Compensation law controls, and that when it appears that an accident occurred on land, and not upon a ship, and the state has provided a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Demeter v. RosenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Hannaford v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Slayback Van Order Co. v. EibenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mason v. MootzIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Mason v. MootzIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API