Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Slayback Van Order Co. v. Eiben

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 27, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The decisive question here is whether the death of Michael Novick, the husband of Eiben’s intestate, was the result of an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment with prosecutor. It was resolved in the affirmative in the Essex Common Pleas, and compensation was awardéd under the Workmen’s Compensation act. Pamph. L. 1911, p. 134. The compensation bureau ruled that the burden of proof had not been sustained.

These are the circumstances: On October 27th, 1928, Michael Novick was employed by .prosecutor as a yardman in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Hercules Powder Co. v. NieratkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Jackson v. D., L. W.R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Hercules Powder Co. v. NieratkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Jack v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fagan v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. McGowan v. Peter Doelger Brewing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Riley v. WeigandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Carter v. Public Service Coord. TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Kelley v. HicksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API