Legal Opinion

Mason v. Mootz

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1953No. 7900Published

1Opinion of the Court

253 P.2d 240 (1953)

MASON et al.

v.

MOOTZ.

No. 7900.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

February 3, 1953.

Hawley & Marcus, Boise, Norris & Norris, Payette, for appellant.

Donart & Donart, Weiser, Welker & Daniel, Payette, Harold Henigson, Nyssa, Or., for respondents.

TAYLOR, Justice.

The plaintiffs (respondents) are the widow and minor daughter of Clarence Mason, deceased. On the evening of March 21, 1951, the deceased and another, as guests, were riding in an automobile owned and driven by the defendant (appellant.) The three were proceeding from Nyssa, Oregon, to the Gay Way, on U. S. Highway 95, in Idaho, when…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Manion Ex Rel. Manion v. WaybrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Rauch v. SteckleinOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Hart v. HinkleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API