Peanut Corporation of America, International Marketing Associates, Inc. v. Hollywood Brands, Inc., Consolidated Foods Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
The appeal raises questions concerning the scope and constitutionality of Virginia’s long-arm statute. Va .Code § 8.01-328.1 et seq. The district court, in a diversity case, had denied the motion of Hollywood Brands, Inc. (“Hollywood”) to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction. The district court found, however, that there was substantial ground for difference of opinion upon the issue and that an immediate appeal from its order might materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. Thereupon, pursuant to FRAP 5, we granted Hollywood’s petition for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- John G. Kolbe, Inc. v. Chromodern Chair Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Consulting Engineers Corp. v. Geometric Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Perdue Foods LLC v. BRF S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- English & Smith, a Virginia Partnership v. Michael H. MetzgerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Choon Young Chung v. Nana Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.