Legal Opinion

Choon Young Chung v. Nana Development Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1986No. 84-2273PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

The issue on appeal is whether an Alaska corporation, defendant NANA Development Corp., is subject to the personal jurisdiction of a federal district court sitting in diversity in Virginia, based upon a single sale in Alaska of reindeer antlers to plaintiff Choon Young Chung, where part of the purchase was subsequently shipped by common carrier to plaintiff in Virginia. The district court found personal jurisdiction to exist under the Virginia long-arm statute, Va.Code § 8.01-328.1(A)(2) (1984). We hold that the “minimum contacts” between NANA and Virginia required by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Germano v. Taishan Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. James D. Mesalic v. Fiberfloat Corp. D/B/A Harley Boat Company, Howard D. Harley, Individually, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Carroll Porter Lillian Porter v. Robert L. GroatCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API