People v. Sorbo

OPINION OF THE COURT

James A. Yates, J.

Defendant, Ciro Sorbo, has moved to suppress statements he alleges were made involuntarily to private individuals and, as well, the fruits of those statements. The People maintain that the defendant’s statements were made voluntarily. In the alternative, they assert that the fruits of a statement made to *392a private party, whether voluntary or not, are not subject to suppression. In addition, the People demand that the defendant specify the statements he claims were illegally obtained. At the same time, however, they oppose disclosure of statements in their…