Exchange National Bank of Tulsa v. Ransom
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS (Jess E.), J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from a portion of a judgment after hearing on a third party The appeal is “from the particular portion of said judgment which orders and decrees that each party to said proceeding pay its own costs therein incurred.”
Pursuant to writ of execution issued upon a judgment secured by respondent against G. M. Ransom, the sheriff levied upon and seized the contents of a safe deposit box consisting principally of a number of cashier’s cheeks and American Express travelers’ cheeks. Grace Carver Ransom filed a third party claim, asserting her title…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Van Denburgh v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Misrach v. LiedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Peterson v. GroesbeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by8 opinions
- Michell v. OlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Estate of FiltzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Estate of BevelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Southern California Collection Co. v. NapkieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Maguire v. CorbettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.