Federico v. DeJoy
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Lucille A Federico, No. CV-22-00706-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Louis DeJoy, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Defendant Louis Dejoy (“Defendant”) has filed his third Motion to Dismiss 16 (Doc. 27)1 Plaintiff Lucille A. Federico’s (“Plaintiff”) Second Amended Complaint 17 (“SAC”) (Doc. 26). The Court must determine whether Plaintiff has pled sufficient facts 18 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”) to state a claim for which 19 relief can be granted. For the following reasons, the Court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.