Legal Opinion
Hochen Ex Rel. Estate of Hochen v. Bobst Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 16, 2002No. 00-1841PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants Ismael Hochen (“Hochen”) and Richard Dufault (“Du-fault”) were injured on August 2, 1994, as a result of an explosion in a printing press at their place of employment, Avery Den-nison Corporation (“Avery”). 1 Hochen and Dufault subsequently brought suit against defendant-appellee, the Bobst Group, Inc. (“Bobst”), 2 claiming liability for negligence, failure to warn, and breach of warranty, in connection with Bobst’s activities related to the printing press in 1971 and 1972 and in 1994. In separate rulings, the district court granted Bobst’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Weisgram v. Marley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Katz v. City Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Currier v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Espinal-AlmeidaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Colt Defense LLC v. Bushmaster Firearms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Beaudette v. Louisville Ladder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Proveris Scientific Corp. v. Innovasystems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.