Legal Opinion

Mann v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 29, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The jury could find that the plaintiff, a passenger upon an elevated train of the defendant going north, came in some five or ten minutes before the accident at the upper level of the Sullivan Square Station in Boston, a plan of which with the location of tracks and platforms or levels forms part of the exceptions. He intended to take a surface car for Stoneham which would come in on track “A,” while the elevated trains ran on the north bound track. After his arrival he waited on the platform for a surface car to Stoneham, and then walked to the southerly end of the station and entered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Neale v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Hurd v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKeown v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Notaro v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Burrill v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API