McKeown v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An action to recover for personal injuries in which a judgment was entered for the plaintiff.
The plaintiff, who was about 45 years of age, had for several years commuted daily from Mill Valley to San Francisco. It was her custom to board defendant railroad company’s electric train at its station at Mill Valley and proceed by a connecting boat to San Francisco. The station was the end of the line, and defendant’s trains ran from Sausalito to Mill Valley and then returned. At the Mill Valley station the defendant had provided concrete platforms on both sides and between the tracks.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Southern Railway Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
- Green v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Tanner v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Barnett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lagomarsino v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Gibson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Gibson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Gibson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Sinclair v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1954