Legal Opinion

Notaro v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The defendant’s tracks were located in a public way at the place in question upon a reserved space laid out by the street commissioners of Boston under statutory authority. The plaintiff Helen C. Notaro, hereafter called the plaintiff, was struck by one of the *297defendant’s cars while standing on' this reservation. She arrived at Upham’s Corner in a street car of the defendant about twenty minutes after five o’clock on the afternoon of October 24, 1927, about three minutes before the accident. She “ alighted from the car upon which she had been riding at that point, and intended to take another…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neale v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Hurd v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Mann v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Nolan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Renwick v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Weir v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Barragate v. Cleveland Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Longin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API