Gonzales v. Arbelbide
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARNS, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiffs and the plaintiffs in intervention separately appeal from the judgment adjudicating their rights to the use of the water of Los Banos Creek to which their lands are riparian.
In 1955 defendant Arbelbide, who owned riparian land upstream from that of the plaintiffs and that of the interveners, commenced pumping water from Los Banos Creek for irrigation purposes. Plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin defendant from so doing. They alleged that their lands were traversed by the creek and that for 50 years last past they had diverted water therefrom for irrigation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Fall River Valley Irrigation District v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Boehmer v. Big Rock Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Majors v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Louie Queriolo Trucking, Inc. v. Superior Court of Kern Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Louie Queriolo Trucking, Inc. v. Superior Court of Kern Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967