Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided April 8, 2004Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Lindbergh Thomas State Representative P.O. Box 505 Grady, AR 71644-0505
Dear Representative Thomas:
You have presented the following question for my opinion:
Does A.C.A. § 14-121-805 require a railroad that has constructed a railroad bridge to widen and/or make improvements (at its own expense) to the bridge in order to accommodate improvements to a drainage ditch running under the bridge?
You indicate that your question arises out of a situation in the City of Gould, Arkansas. You state that the Grady-Gould Flood Prevention Plan calls for the widening of a certain drainage canal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. State of Nebraska the Nebraska Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- CB & Q. RAILWAY v. Drainage Comm'rs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Eady v. LansfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.