Legal Opinion

Eady v. Lansford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 12, 2002No. 02-695PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

In this case, Lewis Eady challenges the constitutionality of the Arkansas Medical Malpractice Act, codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-114-201, et seq. (1987 and Supp. 2001), with respect to cases involving informed consent. The trial court rejected Eady’s argument. Specifically, Eady argues that Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-206(b) (1987 and Supp. 2001) is invalid as special legislation under Ark. Const, amend. 14, and violates his equal protection rights under U.S. Const, amend. 14 and Ark. Const, art. 2, § 3. Alternatively, if§ 16 — 114—206(b) is constitutional, Eady submits that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Streight v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Lanier v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Raley v. WagnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Sundeen v. KrogerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Summerville v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Mitchell v. LincolnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Rose v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API