Legal Opinion

Laguna Hermosa Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 6, 2012No. 2011-5062PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Laguna Hermosa, a concessionaire at the Lake Berryessa recreation area, appeals from the final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing its complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims. Because we find no error in the trial court’s decision, we affirm.

I

The Lake Berryessa recreation area was created in 1957 when the Bureau of Reclamation of the United States Department of the Interior (“the Bureau”) built Monticello Dam on Putah Creek in northern California. The United States owns the recreation area. In 1958, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Diamond v. ChakrabartySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Shell Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. Alabama Power Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Copar Pumice Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API