Legal Opinion

State v. Fontana

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1979No. 10834PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

A jury has found Eugene Thomas Fonta-na guilty of first-degree robbery as defined and denounced by § 560.120, RSMo 1969, now repealed, and kidnapping, as proscribed by § 559.240, RSMo 1969, now repealed. Defendant’s punishment has been assessed at imprisonment for a term of 30 years for first-degree robbery and 10 years for kidnapping. The trial court has ordered that the defendant’s sentences run consecutively. Defendant appeals.

Defendant makes no contention that the evidence is not sufficient to support the convictions, and of course the State is entitled to have the record…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. FrancoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. State v. PetrechkoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. Baker v. AtkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Mama Stuffeati'sMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. O'DELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. MastinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. BizieffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. State v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API