Legal Opinion

People v. Mastin

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1981No. Crim. 14023PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GARDNER, P. J.

In this case we hold that it is a matter of trial court discretion as to whether or not to allow into evidence photographs of inscribed chattels in the face of a best evidence objection.

Michael was convicted of 3 counts of burglary and one of grand theft. Rosemary was convicted of receiving stolen property. Both were convicted of conspiracy and with selling stolen property.

Michael was a blundering burglar. He committed three burglaries and in each case footprints led from the burgled premises to his house. Guns and coin collections were taken. Michael was arrested and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. United States v. James Herbert DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. People v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1874

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. O'DELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. WorthamColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Marquis Durrell Jennings v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API