Legal Opinion

Summer Infant Products, Inc. v. Playskool Baby Products, Inc.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided March 12, 1997No. C.A. 92-267BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCIS J. BOYLE, Senior District Judge.

Summer Infant alleges that Playskool manufactured and sold a “baby bouncer” device which infringed upon Summer Infant’s previously issued patent for such a device, U.S. Patent to Lockett III et al. No. 4,553,-786. (“the patent”). A baby bouncer is a chair for infants with one or more supports resting on the ground or other solid surface, and holding up a frame, usually rectangular in shape, over which a plastic or cloth cover is stretched, on which an infant can be placed. The frame of the device is flexible enough so that the infant can safely…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API