United States v. Warner
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentBaker, Chief Judge
The question presented by this case is whether a reasonable member of the armed forces would have fair notice that possession of images charged under Specification 3 were of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces and thus subject to Article 134 sanction. Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2012). Specification 3 charged Appellant with possession of “some images that depict minors as sexual objects or in a sexually suggestive way.” The images depict young prepubescent and pubescent girls in sexually suggestive positions. In several of these images, girls are dressed as prostitutes…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.