State v. Douglass
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Union District Qourt. — Hon. John W. Harvey, Judge. This is an action in equity to enjoin and abate a saloon nuisance. The suit was commenced in the name of the state by the county attorney. There was a general denial on the part of the defendants, and upon a trial a decree was entered providing for the abatement of the alleged nuisance. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
*4331. Saloon nuisance: temporary injunction without notice: permanent injunction on hearing: appeal. *432— I. The first question presented in the case is the complaint made by defendants that the *433court ordered a temporary injunction with-out notice to the defendants. It is claimed that the statute requires a notice of the application for the writ in all cases where an injunction is sought to enjoin the keeping 0£ a nujsance> The temporary injunction was granted by the judge in vacation. The defendants answered, and filed a motion to dissolve the injunction, on the ground that it was ordered without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drake v. KingsbakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Shear v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Hughes v. EckersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowman v. City of WaverlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Farr v. SeawardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- State v. Boyd Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Newman v. Des Moines CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892