State v. Boyd Bros.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Story District Court. — Hon. D. K. Hindman, Judge. Action in equity to restrain the defendants from maintaining a nuisance by keeping for sale and selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law. After a hearing on the merits, a decree was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, as prayed. The defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
The decree of the district court was rendered on the twenty-ninth day of May, 1890. The plaintiff shows, hy an additional abstract, that the translation of the shorthand reporter’s notes was not filed in the office of the clerk of the district court until the sixth day of January, 1891. That was not in time to secure a trial de novo in this court. Arts v. Culbertson, 78 Iowa, 13; Kavalier v. Machula, 77 Iowa, 121.
Errors hare been assigned by the appellants, of which some have not .been noticed ;n argument, and others relate to the effect of the evidence, and cannot be considered. The only…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kavalier v. MachulaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- State v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Hudspeth v. YetzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Calef v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Yetzer v. WilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894